There’s new legislation in Lansing aimed at preventing universities and other groups from interfering with Michigan college athletes earning money by marketing their name, image, or likeness —also known as NIL.

NIL has become a profitable sideline for many Michigan athletes. Analysts say those deals can be worth millions of dollars, though most are more modest.

But a recent settlement of a national anti-trust lawsuit may change the game.

The House v. NCAA settlement was finalized earlier this month. It resolves multiple antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA and its member schools, awarding $2.8 billion in back pay to athletes who were denied the chance to profit from their name, image, or likeness between 2016 and 2024.

The settlement also creates a framework for future revenue sharing between schools and student-athletes, allowing schools to directly pay athletes for NIL rights, and introduces new roster limits to replace scholarship limits.

However, a clause in the settlement that establishes a special commission to assess deals that student athletes can get is not being welcomed by NIL supporters.

Ramogi Huma, the executive director of the National College Players Association, said he believes such a commission would cost athletes.

“If such violations of Michigan’s NIL law do take place, it could cost Michigan college athletes tens of millions of dollars in NIL compensation each year,” said Huma.

And Thomas Dieters, the board president of Charitable Gift America, a group that negotiates NIL deals, sees the commission as essentially being unfair to student athletes.

“School administrators and coaches are very quick to negotiate their own seven figure contracts without a third party determining their value,” said Dieters, “Students should have those exact same rights.”

Former State House Speaker Joe Tate (D-Detroit) is a former standout athlete at Michigan State University, as well as a player in the National Football League. He’s currently running for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat in 2026.

Tate’s bill would block schools, conferences, governing bodies and other groups from interfering with athletes cutting their own NIL deals.

“One of the things that this legislation looks to do were not only protecting student athletes in their ability to take advantage of their name, image, and likeness — also empowering them,” said Tate.

A University of Michigan Athletics spokesperson declined to comment on the legislation.

A number of universities are worried about funding cuts that are coming from the Trump administration. That includes those in Michigan. 

Wayne State University, the University of Michigan, and Michigan State University collaborate — sharing research and attracting businesses to their campuses. Late last month, Michigan Tech joined the re-branded group that’s now called Research Universities for Michigan. 

At the 2025 Mackinac Policy Conference, presidents from three of the four schools spoke with WDET’s Russ McNamara: MSU President Kevin Guskiewicz, Michigan Tech President Rick Koubec and Wayne State President Kimberly Andrews Espy. 

This isn’t the only way schools are collaborating. Although it’s not yet supported by administrative leadership, faculty at many Big Ten universities are advocating for their respective leadership to sign a NATO-like agreement. It would allow the universities to share attorneys and pool financial resources in case President Donald Trump’s administration targets one of them. 

Use the media player above to hear the full conversation.

Listen to The Metro weekdays from 10 a.m. to noon ET on 101.9 FM and streaming on-demand.

More stories from The Metro

Detroit residents will be voting for a new Mayor this year, and one Michigan State University Professor has some ideas on how the winner can improve support for neighborhoods during their term.

Deyanira Nevárez Martínez is an associate professor of urban and regional planning at MSU. She recently wrote an article for The Conversation outlining where Detroit needs the most work. 

She says there needs to be a focus on ensuring new growth in the city does not displace legacy residents.

“Maybe you look into programs where you can suspend their property taxes for a few years, or you look into programs that will help them invest into their own property and be able to make sure that they can stay in their property.”

Martinez suggested investing in more social infrastructure such as after school programs and community health clinics.

“There is a growing number of folks who need assistance with their housing. They’re not unhoused.” Martinez said. “They are struggling to pay rent, or they’re struggling with other issues. They need assistance with their health care. They need assistance with their schooling, and so those things are incredibly important as well for a thriving community.”

Martinez says the next mayor should prioritize developing more housing on vacant land in the city.

“We insist on having single family residential housing, and potentially, if you have a neighborhood that has several of these lots that are vacant, you can build duplexes on them or triplexes,” Martinez said. “Bring more density into a neighborhood, and then also bring housing types that could be accessible to different kinds of folks in the area as well.”

She also suggested investment in other vacant land opportunities that benefit neighborhood communities, highlighting the city’s solar neighborhood initiative as a great use of vacant land if done responsibly.

Michigan State University researchers have launched a decades-long effort to understand how certain conifer species might adapt to future climate stressors. 

That includes extreme heat and cold, changing soil conditions, invasive pests, disease, and more. 

The project, backed by a $500,000 grant from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, will study three native tree species: jack pine, red pine and eastern white pine, alongside three southern pine species to see how they may adapt to Michigan’s changing environment.

Jeremy Johnson, assistant professor of forest genetics at MSU, says it’s the kind of forward-looking research needed to maintain tree health in the coming century.

“We have to be looking 50 years in the future,” Johnson says. “So much of the research I’ve seen is focused on short-lived species where you can quickly get results but it’s so much harder in [these kinds] trees.”

The research will focus on six test sites statewide and will track progress for 20 years.

Johnson says the study aims to identify trees that are genetically better suited to Michigan’s future climate, and then breed them for stronger growth and resilience.

“We’re dealing with organisms that have very long lives,” explains Johnson “We have to start now, otherwise it’s just going to be too late.”

WDET’s Detroit Tree Canopy Project is an ongoing reporting series that explores the health of Michigan’s trees, forests and urban canopies.