In the midst of consequential and controversial executive actions in Washington, one notable trend has emerged: a significant decline in the number of new laws passed.

According to Punchbowl News, President Trump has signed just five bills into law during his administration, marking the fewest for a new president in seven decades. By comparison, President Trump signed 24 bills into law during the first 100 days of his first term.

The limited number of new laws during this early phase of his current presidency has raised questions, especially given that Republicans currently control the House, Senate, and White House.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | Looking back at President Trump's week of unprecedented economic changes

The low legislative output could be attributed to Republican leaders in Congress aligning with President Trump on a strategy focused on a comprehensive spending bill referred to as the "one big beautiful bill." This legislation is expected to include changes to tax laws and allocate taxpayer funds for significant projects, such as enhancing border security.

A vote on this spending bill is anticipated as soon as next month, although timelines may shift due to potential delays.

While the number of new laws has dwindled, the Trump administration has been marked by a significant number of executive orders. Just weeks ago, President Trump set a record for the most executive orders issued, surpassing a previous benchmark set by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

RELATED STORY | Senate GOP approves framework for Trump's tax breaks and spending cuts after late-night session

Additionally, there has been unprecedented legal activity, with various federal district judges intervening to block parts of the Trump agenda.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the focus remains on the balance between executive actions and legislative achievements in Washington. Stay tuned for further updates on these developments.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

A feud is brewing between President Donald Trump and the Federal Reserve following critical remarks made by Fed Chairman Jerome Powell regarding the economy. Just hours after the Fed's top official expressed concerns over the ongoing trade war and the implications of tariffs, the president took to Truth Social to suggest that the chairman's time at the helm may be nearing its end.

The tension is palpable, as the presidents response came as no surprise after Powell's assessment. The Central Bank leader emphasized the challenges ahead, noting that higher inflation is likely and economic growth is expected to stall due to elevated tariffs that exceed earlier projections.

His extensive speech, marking the first significant commentary since the escalation of the trade war with China, underscored the uncertainty many families face in planning their finances as the economic landscape shifts.

RELATED STORY | Fed chair says higher tariffs 'likely to raise inflation'

In his stern Truth Social post, President Trump criticized the Fed's actions, calling attention to the European Central Bank's recent decision to cut interest rates for the seventh time, while expressing dissatisfaction with the U.S. Federal Reserve's timely response.

President Trump wrote, The ECB is expected to cut interest rates for the 7th time, and yet, Too Late Jerome Powell of the Fed, who is always TOO LATE AND WRONG, yesterday issued a report which was another, and typical, complete mess! Oil prices are down, groceries (even eggs!) are down, and the USA is getting RICH ON TARIFFS. Too Late should have lowered Interest Rates, like the ECB, long ago, but he should certainly lower them now. Powells termination cannot come fast enough!

Later on Thursday, President Trump would not say if he regrets nominating Powell, who became the Federal Reserve chair during the president's first term.

"The only thing that's going up actually is interest rates because we have a federal reserve chairman that is playing politics," he said.

As financial markets reacted negatively to the chairman's remarks, falling both yesterday and this morning, the possibility of a new change at the Federal Reserve looms large. President Trump previously hinted during the last campaign that he may consider firing the Fed chairman should he disagree with his economic strategies, though such a drastic move could invite legal challenges similar to past terminations of other government officials.

RELATED STORY | How the value of the US dollar impacts overseas travel

As the unfolding drama continues, it is clear that the relationship between the White House and the Federal Reserve is under significant strain, with far-reaching effects for both domestic and global financial stability.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia has intensified in recent days, particularly following the revelation of a civil protective order filed against him by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, four years ago. The Department of Homeland Security publicized portions of this order on social media, heightening the White House's argument that Garcia is a violent alleged member of the MS-13 gang.

WATCH | Additional reporting on Kilmar Abrego-Garcia

Abrego-Garcia entering second month in El Salvador prison

Garcia was deported last month to El Salvador, but court documents revealed that he was sent there by mistake. In the weeks since, the White House has insisted that Garcia will remain in El Salvador despite legal efforts to have him returned.

At the center of the discussion is the differing narratives surrounding Garcia. Supporters maintain that he is a family man deserving of compassion, particularly as the Easter season approaches. This perspective was echoed during a recent rally in Maryland, where advocates spoke in favor of Garcia's character. Conversely, the Trump administration is portraying him as a dangerous individual with gang affiliations.'

RELATED STORY | Federal judge to hold Trump administration in criminal contempt for ignoring order on deportations

Legal experts have noted that while the protective order exists, it does not equate to a conviction. In statements, Vasquez Sura acknowledged past issues but emphasized that their marriage has strengthened since then, further complicating the narrative. The Trump administrations relentless campaign in recent days underscores its stance that Garcia is far from an innocent figure, insisting that media portrayals of him as a family-oriented man misrepresent reality.

"After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution after a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order in case things escalated," she said in a statement. "Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling. Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed."

Indeed, the White House has categorically dismissed Garcias characterization as a Maryland father, labeling him instead as an illegal alien with ties to MS-13 and terrorism. This rhetoric persists despite the family's assertion that Garcia is not affiliated with any gang. Previous evidence cited against Garcia has stemmed from confidential informants, adding another layer of ambiguity to the situation.

Currently, Garcia is detained in an El Salvadoran prison, and there are no indications of a quick resolution. In an effort to advocate for Garcia, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat from Maryland, recently traveled to El Salvador, but his attempts to meet with the detained individual were unsuccessful. His visit was met with bureaucratic barriers, as President Nayib Bukele declined a meeting with him.

Amidst this backdrop, tensions continue to rise, particularly between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary. A federal judge has indicated that certain Trump officials might be in contempt of court for actions related to Garcias case. This follows incidents where federal judges criticized the administration for not adhering to court orders. Judge James Boasberg, involved in related immigration matters, expressed concerns about the administration's disregard for his directives regarding the deportation of suspected gang members.

RELATED STORY | ACLU files another lawsuit to stop Trump from using 18th-century law for deportations

The possibility of contempt proceedings adds a significant layer to this ongoing conflict between the judicial system and the Trump administration, with attorneys preparing for potential repercussions. As the case evolves, the public response from both sides of the political spectrum has intensified, illustrating the complexities inherent in immigration enforcement, gang violence, and political narrative.

Garcia's situation illustrates the larger conversations surrounding immigration policy and law enforcement practices, making it a focal point of contention as more lawmakers express interest in visiting El Salvador to advocate on his behalf.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Attention travelers: It's time to take action and check your driver's license soon to see if it's Real ID-compliant.

With less than a month until the May 7 enforcement date, not having the proper identification could affect your travel plans.

How to check

Look at the top of your driver's license. If theres a star, youre good to go! If not, you might face challenges at airline security checkpoints.

What you need to know

Starting May 7, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will enforce the Real ID requirement. Travelers without a compliant ID or another acceptable form of identification may experience delays at airport security, which could put a damper on your vacation.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | Trump signs executive order mandating proof of citizenship for voters

Plan ahead

It's wise to secure your Real ID as soon as possible to avoid missing your flight. With previous deadlines failing to take effect, many may think they have more time. However, the government seems determined this time.

The numbers don't lie

Recent TSA reports indicate that only 80% of travelers currently have an acceptable form of ID. This means many Americans are still traveling without a Real ID dont let that be you!

Alternatives available

Don't panic if your driver's license isnt compliant. A valid passport is accepted as an alternative for air travel. However, be mindful that some DMV locations are experiencing long wait times due to the upcoming deadline.

Linking compliance with convenience, now is the time to ensure your travel plans go smoothly this summer. Safe travels, and dont forget to check your ID!

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to issue critical rulings that may determine the fate of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the future of President Donald Trumps efforts to downsize the federal government.

Previously, lower courts, including district and appeals courts, have provided decisions on these matters. However, the highest court in the land is expected to announce at least temporary rulings soon, which could reverse or uphold those lower court decisions.

RELATED STORY | Trump admin files emergency appeal to Supreme Court over federal worker firings

Among the key issues at stake are recently terminated diversity, equity, and inclusion grants within the Department of Education, as well as the legality of layoffs affecting thousands of probationary employees across six government agencies. The central question remains: Did Trump and his administration have the legal authority to implement these decisions?

The timing of the Supreme Court's pending rulings coincides with ongoing layoffs within the federal government. Earlier this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the dismissal of approximately 10,000 employees across various health agencies. Meanwhile, other government departments have also begun offering buyouts to employees in an effort to streamline operations.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | Scripps News Reports: DOGE Unleashed

In addition to these legal challenges, questions arise regarding Elon Musk's future role within DOGE and the Trump administration. Musk has played an active part in government affairs. However, following a recent defeat in the Wisconsin State Supreme Court race where he invested millions to support the Republican-backed candidate some speculate that his political influence may be dwindling.

President Trump discussed Musk's involvement, suggesting that a departure could be on the horizon.

At some point he's going to be going back. He wants to, Trump said, hinting that Musk may refocus on his business ventures. But I'd keep him as long as I could keep him.

FOLLOWING UP | Scripps News Reports: DOGE Unleashed Part 2

Currently classified as a temporary government employee with a 130-day cap, Musks potential exit could come by the end of May, coinciding with the anticipated Supreme Court rulings.

As the legal landscape evolves, all eyes are on the Supreme Court to see how its decisions will shape the future of both DOGE and broader federal employment practices.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Changes appear to be on the horizon for Social Security recipients that may require more in-person office visits or the use of new online tools.

The Associated Press reports the Trump Administration is instituting these changes in the name of preventing fraud. It's estimated $100 million a year in taxpayer funds is wasted because of fraud associated with direct deposit and Social Security.

Over 72 million Americans receive some sort of Social Security, including those who are retired and those with disabilities.

RELATED STORY | Truth Be Told: Millions of dead people aren't getting Social Security benefits, but...

The changes are set to go into effect at the end of the month and mostly impacts two groups of people: those seeking Social Security benefits for the very first time, and current recipients who are looking to change their bank account information.

If you're a current Social Security recipient and not looking to change your banking information anytime soon, the changes shouldn't impact you, for now. Currently, Social Security recipients are able to verify their identity over the phone. Going forward, an in-person visit to a field office will be required or the use of an online verification system.

RELATED STORY | Truth Be Told: Trump vows not to cut Social Security, Medicare

Social Security advocates are sounding the alarm, saying that not every American has a reliable form of transportation to get to a Social Security office. There are also concerns that many older Americans may struggle with online verification tools.

The upcoming changes come as Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency is also looking to downsize the federal workforce, including the number of federal office locations nationwide.

The Democratic Party is facing record-low favorability ratings, according to new polls from NBC News and CNN.

An NBC News poll found that only 27% of respondents have a positive view of the Democratic Party the lowest figure recorded in the networks polling history dating back to 1990. A separate CNN poll showed similar results, with just 29% of respondents holding a favorable view of the party, marking the lowest in CNNs records as well.

The surveys were conducted before Fridays public clash between Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

RELATED STORY | Senate passes six-month funding bill hours before shutdown deadline

House Democrats voted against a temporary funding bill that could have led to a government shutdown. However, Schumer sided with Republicans to avert a shutdown, frustrating many progressive Democrats across the country.

The Democratic Partys declining favorability follows a difficult November election, in which Republicans retained control of the House and gained control of both the Senate and the White House.

As for President Donald Trump, the NBC News poll showed a mixed picture. A majority of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction. Trumps approval rating stands at 47%, tying the highest mark of his presidency.

RELATED STORY | Sen. Murphy backs Schumer's leadership but says Democrats need new 'tactics'

The U.S. is on the brink of a government shutdown unless the Senate can pass a temporary spending bill by midnight tonight. The urgency intensified after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced his support for a Republican-backed measure, a decision that has sparked varied reactions within his party.

As the deadline approaches, the chances of avoiding a shutdown have significantly improved since Schumer's announcement. At least eight Democratic senators need to join Republicans in order to prevent a shutdown. Currently, only two Democrats have publicly announced their support for the bill, but analysts believe Schumer's endorsement indicates that more Democrats may be willing to cross party lines.

The political climate in Washington has shifted rapidly. Just a day prior, Schumer was criticized by conservatives as "shut down Schumer." Now, many progressives refer to him as surrender Schumer. House Democrats, especially those on the progressive wing, had hoped to leverage the current situation to advocate for robust protections against proposed cuts to programs such as Social Security and Medicare, as well as to resist the influence of wealthy individuals like Elon Musk.

RELATED STORY | Who is Amy Gleason, the woman who actually heads DOGE?

In a statement to reporters, Schumer conveyed that a government shutdown would not serve the best interests of the country and could result in greater harm to Americans. He emphasized the need for government functionality, asserting, "It is my job to make the best choice for the country to minimize the harms to the American people."

Contrasting Schumers stance, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, provided a more combative perspective, stating that the situation transcends party affiliation and highlights broader concerns regarding significant cuts to essential federal programs.

"This is about the evisceration of the federal government," she asserted, calling on her colleagues to stand firm against proposals that would undermine critical social safety nets.

As the political drama unfolds, attention turns to which six Senate Democrats might align with Schumer. The evolving situation will be monitored closely as lawmakers prepare for a potential vote after the lunch hour.

RELATED STORY | Former US Sen. Alan Simpson of Wyoming dies at age 93

In addition to the immediate funding crisis, discussions about the broader political implications are also taking shape. Recent polling indicates a majority of Americans may hold Congressional Republicans accountable should a shutdown occur. However, some observers suggest party leaders may not be swayed by public sentiment, especially as the Trump administration continues to exert influence over Republican strategy in Congress.

Looking ahead, the resolution of the funding standoff could quickly pivot the political narrative toward President Donald Trump's legislative agenda, which includes significant tax reforms. The debate over federal funding is just the beginning, with more contentious issues on the horizon as lawmakers navigate a rapidly evolving political landscape.

As the deadline for a potential government shutdown approaches, U.S. lawmakers are scrambling to reach a compromise. The deadline to keep the government operational is Friday night. The House has passed a continuing resolution to fund the government, but Senate Democrats are threatening to block the measure from reaching President Donald Trump's desk.

Democratic lawmakers are raising concerns about the duration of proposed stopgap funding and are urging for more formal negotiations. With a Friday night deadline, the urgency is palpable on Capitol Hill.

While last-minute agreements have historically been negotiated in similar circumstances, there remains uncertainty about whether a deal can be struck this time. In the event of a shutdown, the immediate impacts may be minimal over the weekend when most government agencies are closed. However, by Monday morning, the effects of a shutdown would begin to be felt more widely.

RELATED STORY |Trump administration withdraws nomination of David Weldon for CDC director

Political dynamics have shifted significantly in the last day, with an increasing number of Senate Democrats declaring their opposition to the continuing resolution. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has stated that Republicans appear to lack the necessary votes to pass the continuing resolution without Democratic support. At least eight Senate Democrats would need to join Republicans to ensure the bill's passage.

Recently, Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colorado, has publicly announced his opposition to the proposed funding bill, emphasizing the need to preserve the authority of Congress.

We need a funding bill that preserves Congress's authority and, by extension, your voice," he said.

As internal discussions continue, some Democrats are facing pressure from their constituents urging them to resist the presidents policies. With limited leverage in Congress, Democrats feel compelled to take a stand in moments like these.

Conversely, not all Democrats are aligned in their opposition to the funding measure. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pennsylvania, appears willing to collaborate with Republicans to prevent a government shutdown. Fetterman warned that dragging negotiations to the last minute could lead to detrimental consequences for millions of Americans.

RELATED STORY | Trump threatens 200% tariff on European alcohol in response to EU whiskey tax

Amidst these discussions, there is speculation about how the Trump administration might respond if a shutdown occurs. Some legal experts have suggested that a shutdown could grant the administration increased authority over government operations, raising concerns among Democrats about potential firings and agency closures.

As the deadline approaches, lawmakers are acutely aware of the stakes and the potential ramifications of failing to reach an agreement. In the turbulent world of American politics, two days can feel like an eternity, and parties remain hopeful that a resolution can be found before time runs out.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

House Republicans are set to vote today on a spending bill aimed at keeping the government funded through September, despite opposition from Democrats who plan to block the legislation. This comes as concerns over the economy mount, following significant declines in the stock market.

In an interview with Fox Business correspondent Maria Bartiromo, President Donald Trump did not refrain from predicting a recession, a stance that unsettled Wall Street. Market analysts were hoping for a simple "no" response to the recession question, but instead heard uncertainty, contributing to recent market volatility.

JPMorgan Chase has since increased its estimates for the likelihood of a recession this year from 30% to 40%, attributing the shift to "extreme U.S. policies." Rising costs on Main Street, particularly record-high egg prices, are also raising alarms. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers remarked a couple of months ago, recession was really unlikely this year. Now it's probably getting close to 50-50, he said.

RELATED STORY | Senate confirms Lori Chavez-DeRemer as Trump's labor secretary

Despite these economic jitters, optimism persists among some Republican lawmakers, who believe a forthcoming tax bill could stimulate growth and restore confidence on Wall Street.

In related developments, former President Trump is scheduled to address business leaders today regarding the economy, which presents an opportunity for him to clarify his remarks and potentially ease market concerns.

As lawmakers navigate economic vulnerabilities, they are also grappling with the looming threat of a government shutdown. While previous shutdowns have been averted since 2018, the political landscape has shifted with the new Trump administration, leading to increased uncertainty.

Democrats, despite currently holding limited power in Congress, are emphasizing their influence in shutdown negotiations. Some of the party's members are now poised to vote against funding measures, marking a significant shift in their typical stance of supporting government continuity.

RELATED STORY | Trump calls for primary challenger against Republican who opposes funding bill

Today's vote in the House is critical, as the federal government is on track to run out of funding by Friday night. Although Republicans can technically pass the bill without Democratic support, they will need nearly unanimous backing from their party to succeed. If successful in the House, attention will then turn to the Senate, where bipartisan cooperation will be necessary to avert a shutdown later this week.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

In his first joint address of a second term before Congress, President Donald Trump spoke for nearly an hour and 40 minutes Wednesday night, marking the longest address of its kind in modern American history. Trump celebrated what he considers significant early accomplishments and aspirations for his administration, earning multiple standing ovations from Republican lawmakers.

"We are entering our greatest era," President Trump declared. "With God's help over the next four years, we are going to lead this nation even higher and forge the freest, most advanced, most dynamic, and most dominant civilization ever to exist on the face of this Earth."

He expressed ambition to enhance the quality of life for Americans and to build "the safest, wealthiest, healthiest, and most vital communities anywhere in the world."

The president emphasized a commitment to advancing science and space exploration, vowing to lead humanity toward Mars and beyond.

RELATED STORY | Supreme Court rules against Trump administration in foreign aid case

One major economic theme addressed was tariffs, a topic of considerable discussion heading into the speech. President Trump reaffirmed his support for tariffs as a means to bring jobs back to the United States and bolster domestic manufacturing. He announced that reciprocal tariffs would take effect on April 2 for countries that impose tariffs on American goods.

"We will tariff them back. Whatever they tax us, we will tax them," President Trump stated, reiterating his belief that such measures will protect American interests.

The presidents tone shifted regarding Ukraine, as he aimed to ease tensions following a recent contentious meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. President Trump hinted at a willingness to pursue diplomatic solutions to the ongoing conflict.

"We've had serious discussions with Russia and received strong signals that they are ready for peace," he said, framing the conflict as "senseless."

Although Trump appeared to extend an olive branch to Ukraine, a report from the Financial Times indicated that the U.S. may be halting intelligence sharing with the nation.

Democrats in attendance reacted variably to Trump's address. Some boycotted the speech, while others donned colors to show solidarity with different causes. Texas Congressman Al Green was forcibly removed after disrupting the address to proclaim that President Trump lacked a mandate to lead.

The official Democratic response was provided by Sen. Alyssa Slotkin of Michigan, who criticized the president's approach to foreign relations.

"Trump believes in cozying up to dictators like Vladimir Putin and kicking our friends like the Canadians in the teeth," Slotkin said. "He sees American leadership as merely a series of real estate transactions."

As Trumps administration faces challenges ahead regarding tariffs, Ukraine, and proposed tax legislation, political analysts expect these issues to dominate the narrative in the coming months. Despite Republican control of both the House and Senate, the path forward for the presidents tax bill appears fraught with difficulty.

President Donald Trump is set to deliver an address to a joint session of Congress for the first time during his second term, coinciding with his decision to impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from Canada and Mexico. This new policy has raised concerns about potential price increases for American consumers, with estimates suggesting that the tariffs could cost average Americans between $500 and $2,000 annually.

Target's CEO announced earlier today that the retail giant would likely raise prices within days, indicating the immediate impact of the tariffs on everyday products. This situation is being characterized as the beginning of a trade war, with economists predicting significant price hikes for consumers as a direct result of the tariffs.

Notably, much of the produce sold in U.S. stores, including bananas, strawberries, and avocados, originates from Mexico during this time of year.

RELATED STORY | Trade relations strained as US, Canada, and Mexico face tariff showdown

Adding to the economic concerns, the U.S. is also implementing new tariffs of 10% on certain goods from China. These increases could directly affect popular consumer items, such as pickup trucks, many of which are manufactured in Mexico. Mexico's foreign minister recently indicated that the tariffs might lead to a price increase of $3,000 on such vehicles. Furthermore, the Beer Institute reported that 18% of beer consumed in the U.S. is imported, primarily from Mexico, which could also see price hikes due to the tariffs.

President Trump's rationale for these tariffs is linked to his administration's ongoing efforts to combat the illegal drug trade, particularly the trafficking of fentanyl. He contends that Canada, Mexico and China need to do more to address the drug crisis that has devastated communities across the United States. Since taking office, Trump has adopted a tariff-focused economic strategy, believing it will spur domestic investment by encouraging companies to establish operations within the U.S. to avoid such costs.

Tonight's address is a significant opportunity for President Trump to engage with a large television audience and outline his broader economic agenda, which includes tax cuts and deregulation. This address, while not a traditional State of the Union, is reminiscent in its scope and will allow President Trump to discuss his administration's accomplishments, including improvements at the U.S. border and trade negotiations.

RELATED STORY | These are some goods in the crosshairs of Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China

As the president addresses a Congress marked by political division, Democrats are preparing to offer rebuttals. Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a newly elected Democrat from Michigan, will deliver the official response to President Trumps speech. Meanwhile, some Democratic members have chosen to protest the address by skipping it, while others invite recently laid-off federal workers as their guests, highlighting the impact of the Trump administration's policies.

The president's address, scheduled for 9 p.m. Eastern Time, is shaping up to be a crucial moment for his administration amidst ongoing domestic challenges and international scrutiny.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

President Donald Trump will deliver one of his biggest speeches of the year Tuesday night in prime time to a joint session of Congress on social media.

On Monday, President Trump previewed the speech.

"I will tell it like it is," President Trump wrote on Truth Social.

This will be President Trump's fifth address to a joint session of Congress. During his first term, these speeches could be unpredictable. In 2020, for instance, he awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the late conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh during his remarks.

President Trump is expected to use this speech to outline his vision for the economy, immigration, and foreign affairs.

Democrats will also use the opportunity to present their vision for the country. Newly elected Democratic Sen. Alyssa Slotkin of Michigan has been selected to deliver the official response.

RELATED STORY | White House takes control of media access to the president

Some Democrats, meanwhile, like Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, have announced they will protest the speech by not attending it, while others have said they will bring recently fired federal workers as their official guests.

Temporary fences have been put up around the Capitol in preparation for the event to increase security.

Tuesday's primetime speech is not technically being called a State of the Union, although it will look and feel like one. That's because President Trump has only been in office a few weeks.

President Trump's remarks begin shortly after 9 p.m. Eastern time on Tuesday.

RELATED STORY | Trump reflects on meeting with Zelenskyy: 'He very much overplayed his hand'

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

In a groundbreaking interview Tuesday night on Fox News, President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk appeared together for the first time, solidifying their partnership as they discussed plans for government efficiency and fiscal responsibility. The duo praised each other extensively, showcasing a blossoming friendship that has captured the attention of political observers.

At first glance, the optics of Musk sitting next to the Presidentone of the worlds richest men alongside the leader of the free worldwas striking. It resembled a true bromance as Trump noted the speculation surrounding the longevity of their partnership, particularly given the often-competing egos of billionaire figures.

The discussion quickly turned to the central focus of the interview: the ambitious goal of securing $1 trillion through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). While Musk indicated that approximately $50 billion had been found thus far, some independent analysts have suggested a figure closer to $5 billion. Regardless of the precise amount, the U.S. can expect significant downsizing and potentially controversial initiatives from the Trump administration in the near future.

RELATED STORY | Upcoming tariffs: Trump signals 25% fees on key imports beginning in April

One of the significant points raised during the interview was President Trumps assurance that crucial social programs would remain untouched. He explicitly stated that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid would not be affected by the ongoing efforts of DOGE, despite speculation regarding potential cuts.

I think hes gonna find a trillion dollars, President Trump said during the interview. Social Security wont be touched... Medicare, Medicaid, none of that stuff is gonna be touched.

This assertion is particularly relevant as discussions around budget cuts continue to swirl in Washington.

A vital function of the DOGE team is to ensure that executive orders from the president are effectively implemented, Musk said.

If the bureaucracy is fighting the will of the people and preventing the president from implementing what the people want, then we live in a bureaucracy and not a democracy, Musk stated, underlining the importance of this initiative.

RELATED STORY | Judge rejects request to block Elon Musk, DOGE from accessing government data

As the implications of DOGE unfold, the political landscape is set for further examination of potential cuts and efficiency reforms in the months ahead.

With the partnership of Trump and Musk at the forefront, all eyes will be on Washington as the administration works to advance its agenda for government efficiency while navigating the complexities of American politics.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

In a wave of layoffs sweeping through the federal government, the Department of Health and Human Services, now led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., conducted terminations over the weekend, as first reported by The Washington Post. The Federal Aviation Administration union has warned employees that they may face access restrictions as they return to work on Tuesday following a long holiday weekend.

The Associated Press has also reported that layoffs at the Internal Revenue Service could occur later this week, amplifying concerns about the extensive reach of these job cuts.

While Virginia, Maryland, and D.C. are feeling the effects of these layoffs, a union representing federal workers has emphasized that 80% of its membership resides outside the D.C. metropolitan area, indicating the potential national implications of these layoffs.

Targeted in these layoffs are probationary employees, often newly hired individuals or those recently transferred to a new federal agency position. Legal experts suggest this group is being targeted as the Trump administration believes it has more legal authority to terminate probationary staff compared to longer-tenured civil servants.

The layoffs may pose challenges not only for affected employees and their families but also for the greater Washington, D.C. economy. The local housing market is reportedly already feeling the effects of this instability. There are also concerns regarding the services provided to American taxpayers, such as passport renewals and food stamp applications, which could be hindered by a diminished workforce.

Despite the Trump administration's assertions that core agency functions will remain uninterrupted, critics, including Democrats, argue that it is implausible to cut tens of thousands of jobs without impacting service delivery to the American public.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

President Donald Trump has ordered 1,500 additional U.S. troops to the southern border, marking a 60% increase in military presence since Monday, according to the Pentagon.

The deployment is part of ongoing efforts to bolster border security and immigration control.

RELATED STORY | Trump signs executive order declaring a national emergency at the southern US border

Previously, the Biden administration had stationed around 2,200 service members mostly in the El Paso, Texas, area to assist primarily with ministerial duties. But President Trump's order appears to go even further.

Acting Secretary of Defense Robert Salesses stated that the military will provide "increased detection and monitoring efforts" and support Department of Homeland Security deportation flights of more than 5,000 illegal aliens detained by Customs and Border Protection in the San Diego, California, and El Paso, Texas, sectors.

RELATED STORY | Truth Be Told: Trump is not the first president to send troops to border

Salesses added that troops will also "begin assisting in the construction of temporary and permanent physical barriers to add additional security to curtail illegal border crossings and illicit trafficking."

Additionally, the Pentagon has hinted at more missions to come, with military personnel potentially assisting in what Salesses described as "additional missions in cooperation with DHS, federal agencies, and state partners."

RELATED STORY | Trump announces former acting ICE Director Tom Homan as new 'border czar'

But the military isn't the only group of individuals being reassigned to the southern border.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the reassignment of DEA agents, the U.S. Marshal Service, and other federal agents to immigration-related duties suggests a broadening of focus on border security, acknowledging that ICE may lack the resources to fulfill all the administration's demands.

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

President Donald Trump has vowed to lower prices for all Americans, and on day one of his presidency he signed an executive order directing his cabinet agencies to do just that. But he also likes the idea of tariffs, which could work counter to that goal.

"We're talking about a tariff of 10% on China based on the fact that they're sending fentanyl to Mexico and Canada," he said at a press conference this week. "Probably February 1st is the date we're looking at."

RELATED STORY | Trump says he's considering 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada starting in February

President Trump has hinted that new tariffs could not just hit Chinese-made products, but products made in Mexico and Canada as well. But will these costs be passed on to consumers?

Last year, senior leaders at Walmart said that they would most likely have to raise prices on certain goods if tariffs are levied. But White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during the campaign that money and investment returning to America from oversees as a result of these penalizing tariffs would actually help the U.S. economy.

Leaders in China, Canada and Mexico have all criticized the possible tariffs, with officials in Beijing saying trade wars have "no winners."

RELATED STORY | What are tariffs? How the Trump administration plans to implement them in 2025

Still, President Trump appears to be forging ahead with his plan for new tariffs and he's not ruling out additional tariffs on other countries as well.

On Inauguration Day, he also took time to acknowledge former President William McKinley for his use of tariffs in the late 1800s even vowing to rename America's tallest peak Mt. McKinley.

President Donald Trump issued a historic number of executive actions on Monday, ranging from declaring a national emergency at the U.S. southern border to withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization to pardoning more than 1,500 people associated with the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol.

But executive orders can only do so much. For many of the big promises that President Trump made on the campaign trail, he'll need Congress to act.

That is why President Trump has now shifted his focus from immediate actions being taken to more of his long-term strategy for implementing his agenda in the future.

RELATED STORY | President Trump says US will 'flourish and be respected' under his leadership

The president met with Republican leadership Tuesday, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, for a strategy session at the White House.

Big items like funding for the border, eliminating taxes on tips, and gutting electric vehicle rules will require Congressional involvement.

However, currently there is some disagreement among Republicans on President Trump's strategy moving forward.

RELATED STORY | Florida wastes no time in adopting 'Gulf of America' name after Trump's executive order

Some lawmakers on Capitol Hill would like to see multiple bills, perhaps one focused on immigration and another focused on taxes. Some other GOP lawmakers believe passing one giant bill is the best path to ensure President Trump's priorities actually become law.

It's not expected that Congress will act as quickly as President Trump did with his many executive orders. It may not be until spring when any votes are scheduled on any consequential bill.