Michigan officials and advocates often say the state needs to give college graduates a reason to stay here and not look for economic opportunities elsewhere.

But a new report finds Michigan is actually doing a better job of keeping its homegrown students at home than many suggest.

The study, “Talent in Motion,” comes from the non-profit Strada Education Foundation.

The group’s research director at its Institute for the Future of Work is Dr. Peter Bahr. He says college-educated workers are still a key part of creating a thriving workplace.

Interview edited for length and clarity.

Peter Bahr: We know that the highly educated populations help create and sustain economic growth. And as a result of that, many states, including Michigan, have set very ambitious goals to expand their college-educated workforces. But states are making investments to achieve those goals somewhat blind, without the critical information about where their college-educated workers actually come from. We conducted this study to help solve that problem. And we created the most complete portrait to date of the sources of states’ college-educated workers.

One of the most surprising findings was that, despite much attention to recruiting college-educated workers from other areas, a state’s main source of college-educated talent is their own high schools. Across the nation about 2/3 of college-educated workers live in the state where they graduated from high school. And 55 % graduated from both high school and college in the state where they now work. Michigan, however, was remarkable because it had 72%, the highest share of college-educated workers who had graduated from both high school and college in the same state.

Quinn Klinefelter, WDET News: You’d worked as a professor for the University of Michigan and Wayne State University. With that background, what did you think when you saw this data?

PB: I was surprised by how prominent Michigan was in that regard, what a strong share it had. I had heard for many years about the retention rate issue. And to see that Michigan is actually ahead of the average in terms of the retention of college graduates, I thought it was a very encouraging finding for a state that I think is just a wonderful place. On the other hand, many states are struggling with the contraction in their workforce driven by other factors, including retirements from the Baby Boom generation. That’s a big one with Michigan.

QK: You hear so much from government officials and others about the “brain drain” and the state losing homegrown talent. What are you finding in terms of how universities and state governments, for that matter, are operating to keep and retain talent?

PB: You’re definitely pointing to an important issue. We didn’t tackle that specifically in this report, but what we did find was related. College-educated workers that graduated from public colleges and universities are much more likely to be in that homegrown segment. And that’s especially true of the broad access publics like the regional four-year universities. I’m thinking Eastern Michigan, Western, Central. The share of their graduates that are homegrown is exceptionally high. We can contrast that with private institutions, where there’s a much smaller share of graduates who are homegrown. The public institutions, particularly non-selective or less selective, broad access, regional institutions are very much the backbone of the talent production pipeline.

In addition, colleges and universities can be part of the solution too. They need to make sure that their programs are connected to real opportunities in the workforce. And then reinforce those bridges to quality jobs by engaging their local employers in work-based learning opportunities for their students.

QK: And that’s not happening that much currently?

PB: I think everybody has got this on their mind. But it isn’t something that’s necessarily at the top of the priority list. But it is a key element of ensuring that graduates can get quality jobs.